Siberia, with its endless open spaces and natural resources, was considered by the supreme power as an unconditional patrimony. Cossacks and governors were used as a support with the help of which the central government conducted its policy. But, from time to time, in the chain of “supreme power-local power-worldly organizations” there were failures. The local authorities, although interested in serving the Cossacks, very often came into conflict with him. Service people protected themselves, their own class interests and corporate rights, and not only from the claims of the greedy governor. Decisions of the supreme power, contradicting and damaging the class interests of the Cossacks, demanded great flexibility and considerable courage to protect them. On this basis, social conflicts occurred “smoothly” developing into revolts, protest movements. The article discusses the socio-political movements of the end of the XVII – the first quarter of the XVIII centuries, of which The Second Krasnoyarsk “shatost” of 1716–1722, almost unknown to science, was a clash between the serving Cossacks and the local authorities in the person of a dashing Dmitry Zubov. It was during periods of social tension, when the antagonism of the opposing sides reached the highest limit, that tendencies towards the self-government of the serving Cossacks are most clearly observed. The dialectic of the Cossack self-government is analyzed, often replacing the self-government of other classes. The complication of the relationship between the local administration and the service army and their peculiarities in the context of Peter's reforms and the emerging absolutism are shown.

Chernysheva Arina Alexandrovna, Postgraduate, Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V. P. Astafyev, 89, Ada Lebedeva st., Krasnoyarsk, 664049, Russian Federation; Teacher of History Secondary School N 97 of Krasnoyarsk, 12v, Matrosov st., Krasnoyarsk, 660012, Russian Federation, tel.: 8(913)519-56-26, e-mail: Arina.4ernisheva@mail.ru

Chernysheva А.A. Features of Cossack Self-Government in Eastern Siberia in the Late XVII – First Quarter of the XVIII Century (by Example of the First Krasnoyarsk “Shatost” and the Second Krasnoyarsk “Shatost”). The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series History, 2019, vol. 28, pp. 6–16. https://doi.org/10.26516/2222-9124.2019.28.6 (in Russian)

1. Alexandrov V.A., Pokrovsky N.N. Vlast i obshchestvo. Sibir XVIIv. [Power and Society: Siberia in the XVII century]. Novosibirsk, Science. Sib. Separation Publ., 1991, 399 p. (in Russian)
2. Barakhovich P.N. Sluzhiloe haselenie Tsentralnoq Sibiri v XVII stoletii (Eniseiskii I Krasnoyarskii uezdy) [The serving population of Central Siberia in the XVII century (Yenisei and Krasnoyarsk counties). Cand. sci. diss.]. Krasnoyarsk, 2016, 438 p. (in Russian)
3. Bakhrushin S.V. Nauchnye Trudy [Scientific works]. Moscow, Acad. Sciences USSR Publ., 1952-1959, vol.4. , 257 p. (in Russian)
4. Borodaev V.B., Kontev A.V. Formirovanie rossiiskoi granitsy v Irtyshsko-Eniseiskom mezhdureche v 1620-1720gg. [Formation of the Russian border in the Irtysh-Yeniseiinterfluve in 1620–1720]. Barnaul, ASPU Publ., 2015, 416 p. (in Russian)
5. Bykonya G.F. Kazachestvo I drugoe sluzhebnoe naselenie Vostochnoi Sibiri v XVIII – nachale XIX veka: demografo-soslovnyi aspect [The Cossacks and other service populationof East Siberia in the XVIII – early XIX centuries (a demographic-estate aspect)]. Krasnoyarsk, KGPU Publ., 2015, 414 p. (in Russian)
6. Bykonya G. F. Kto osnoval Sayanskii ostrog – Ilya Nashivoshnikov ili Ilya Surikovym? [Who founded the Sayan burg - Ilya Nashivoshnikov or Ilya Surikov?]. Drevnie poseleniya Sibiri: ohrana, sohranenie, ispolzovanie [Ancient settlements of Siberia: protection, preservation, use: Proceedings of Scientific and Practical Conf/, dedicated 295th anniversary of the Sayan. jail].Shushenskoe, 2014, pp. 30-55. (in Russian)
7. Bykonya G.F.  Zaselenie russkimi Prieniseiskogo kraya v XVIII v. [Settlement of the Cis-Yenisey Region by the Russians in the XVIII Century]. Novosibirsk, RAS publ., 1981, 248 p. (in Russian)
8. Goncharov Yu.M., Ivonin A.R. Ocherki istorii goroda Tary kontsa XVI- nachala XX vv. [Essays on the history of the city of Tara of the end of the XVI - early XX centuries]. Barnaul, Publishing House Az Buka Publ., 2006,188 p. (in Russian)
9. Zolnikova N.D. Chelobitnaya krasnoyarskih sluzhilyh ludei 1702 [Chelobitnaya Krasnoyarsk service people in 1702]. Obshchestvennoe soznanie, knizhnost, literature perioda feodalizma [Public consciousness, literacy, literature of the period of feudalism]. Novosibirsk, 1990, pp. 258-262. (in Russian)
10. Minenko N. A. Severo-Zapadnaya Sibir v XVIII – pervoi polovine XIX v. [Northwestern Siberia in the 18th – first half of the 19th centuries].  Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., Sib. Separation, 1975, 308 p. (in Russian)
11. Nikitin N.I. O sotsialnoi priroda kazachih soobshchestv XVI–XVII v. [On the social nature of the Cossack communities of the XVI–XVII centuries]. Ist. zapiski [Hist. notes], 2016, no. 16, pp. 172-233. (in Russian)   
12. Ogloblin N. N. Krasnoyarskii bunt 1695-1698 (k istorii narodnyh dvizhenii XVII v.) [The Krasnoyarsk riot of 1695–1698 (To the history of popular movements of the XVII century.)]. Zhurn. m-va narod.prosveshcheniya [Journ. m-va people. enlightenment]. SPb, part CCCXXXV (no. 5), Dep. 2, 1901, pp. 25-69. (in Russian)
13. Chernysheva A.A. Sotsialnyi sostav uchastnikov maloizuchennogo narodnogo dvizheniya v Prieniseiskom krae vo vtorom desyatiletii XVII v. [The social composition of participants in the little-known popular movement in the Yenisey Territory in the second decade of the 17th century]. VIII Kraevedcheskie chteniya «Possiya- Sibir- Krasnoyarskii krai» [VIII Local Lore Readings “Russia – Siberia – Krasnoyarsk Territory”]. Krasnoyarsk, 2017, pp.72-79. (in Russian) 
14. Sherstoboev V.N. Pashnya Ilimskogo voevodstva XVII I nachala XVIII veka [The ploughed fields of Ilimsk of the XVIIth and Beginning of the XVIIIth Century]. Irkutsk, Irkut. region state publishing house Publ., 1949, vol. 1, 596 p. (in Russian)